Home Healthcare Trying Again: Honoring Second Probability Month at HHS

Trying Again: Honoring Second Probability Month at HHS

Trying Again: Honoring Second Probability Month at HHS


April 2023 was Second Probability Month, a time that’s targeted on making certain those that have been concerned with the prison justice system are really given the chance to efficiently reenter their communities. As we work our method in the direction of the tip of summer season, it’s straightforward for this focus to get misplaced with all the things else that is happening in our private {and professional} lives. To remind us of the significance of this month and all that it signifies all year long, I wish to share some details about reentry from incarceration and highlights from a reentry simulation the U.S. Division of Well being and Human Providers (HHS) held throughout Second Probability Month. 

The Division of Justice stories there are greater than 600,000 individuals returning to the neighborhood from incarceration on a yearly foundation. These persons are disproportionately Black, Native American, and Latino. For instance, Black individuals make up 12 p.c of the U.S. inhabitants, however 38 p.c of people who’re incarcerated.1 These coming back from correctional settings face compounding types of marginalization and have a number of complicated wants that may embrace (however should not restricted to) issue acquiring gainful employment, accessing housing and transportation, receiving therapy for bodily and psychological well being points, experiencing substance use problems, and accessing greater training. Most of these returning to the neighborhood have confronted these obstacles earlier than their engagement with the justice system. Analysis  exhibits that folks additionally wrestle when our programs don’t present entry to providers to satisfy primary wants, and sadly, re-arrest is a typical final result after launch. For these held in state prisons, the speed of re-arrest is estimated at over 60 p.c inside the first three years after launch and will increase to over 80 p.c inside 9 years after launch.2

These excessive charges of re-involvement with the prison justice system are a trigger for concern, and the mortality price of individuals  after launch is equally alarming. Danger of demise is considerably greater after launch and incarceration general is related to decreased life expectancy.3,4 Substance use problems are one main reason for this.  Overdose is the main reason for demise amongst individuals lately launched from jail and the third main reason for demise in custody in U.S. jails.5 Folks incarcerated in state prisons are 129 occasions extra more likely to die from an overdose inside two weeks after their launch in comparison with most people.6 This underscores the position well being and human providers can play to assist people survive and thrive as they reenter society.

On Might twenty fifth 2022, to extend public belief and improve public security and safety by encouraging equitable and community-oriented policing, the Biden-Harris Administration issued the Govt Order on Advancing Efficient, Accountable Policing and Prison Justice Practices to Improve Public Belief and Public Security. This government order established the Federal Interagency Alternate options and Reentry Committee (ARC) which is charged with growing and coordinating the implementation of a strategic plan to cut back racial, ethnic, and different disparities within the Nation’s prison justice system. To enhance this work, and in honor of Second Probability Month, the Administration for Youngsters and Households (ACF), Workplace of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Analysis (ASPE), and the HHS Partnership Middle hosted a reentry from incarceration simulation within the Nice Corridor on Wednesday, April 12, 2023. This reentry simulation allowed HHS management and workers to expertise a fraction of the difficult and sometimes biased actuality of navigating providers for people reentering the neighborhood from incarceration. It elevated the challenges confronted by many and sparked concepts for HHS motion in accordance with Biden-Harris Administration priorities.

Opening Remarks
Hope MacDonald Lone Tree, Deputy Commissioner for the Administration for Native Individuals in ACF, opened the occasion with an outline of the dimensions of the prison justice system, citing that round 5.5 million persons are at the moment incarcerated or on probation or parole. Rachel Pryor, Counselor to Secretary Becerra, shared the Biden-Harris Administration’s dedication to advancing efficient and accountable policing and prison justice reform insurance policies. Remarks highlighted essential work HHS is doing associated to prison justice reform, reminiscent of:

Reentry Simulation
Tasha Aikens, Coverage Advisor on the U.S. Division of Justice, facilitated the reentry simulation. Throughout this simulation, HHS workers obtained fake identities of people who have been lately launched from incarceration, together with primary data on demographics and present social circumstances. The contributors accomplished actions which can be typical of somebody who has lately been launched, reminiscent of getting authorities identification, discovering employment, sustaining neighborhood supervision necessities, and looking for substance use therapy. On the finish of the simulation, most HHS workers failed to finish most of the every day duties required to take care of their livelihood after reentry and because of this, skilled housing insecurity and even reincarceration. HHS workers shared how this expertise offered super perception into the on a regular basis challenges and obstacles endured by these returning to their communities from incarceration.

Panel Dialogue
The occasion concluded with a panel elevating perception from these with lived expertise. , The panel included y Clinton Lacey, President and CEO of the Credible Messenger Mentoring Motion, John Bae and Angel Sanchez, Second Probability Fellows at DOJ and was moderated by Dr. Rev. Que English, Director of the HHS Partnership Middle..  Reflecting on the simulation and their private experiences with reentry, the panel touched on what is required for a person’s success after launch from incarceration. Clinton Lacey defined that “…individuals go in [to carceral settings] usually harm and failed and underserved…and we all know inside it doesn’t get higher…so then they arrive residence with unaddressed wants and with collateral penalties and obstacles…by and huge individuals have been vastly impacted and have fallen by way of the cracks, been failed by a bunch of different establishments of care by the point they get to the [justice] system.”

The expectations positioned on these returning after incarceration can show fairly burdensome and almost unattainable, because the simulation confirmed. Angel Sanchez remarked that “If people are failing, these establishments shouldn’t be succeeding…incentives are sometimes misaligned the place your failure doesn’t matter to those establishments, and worse, your failure is making certain job employment alternatives and job safety…there then is not any purpose for empathy and all [those returning] are going to depend upon likelihood or charity. And we shouldn’t be relying on likelihood or charity, we must always need standardized success.”

The provision of providers for these returning varies extensively throughout the nation. Whereas some areas dedicate vital time and assets to develop providers particular to these launched on neighborhood supervision, different areas work to make one of the best of extra fragmented assets and approaches to service supply. Lacey argued that we’d like greater than only a service mannequin or strategy, and “…there must be a shift from investments and reliance on authorities programs and businesses and a necessity for a shift to a higher funding and reliance on neighborhood, individuals, significantly individuals who have been impacted, who’ve a perspective, who’ve expertise, who’ve options, who’ve experience.” John Bae echoed this sentiment and reiterated that “…altering the method begins with reorienting our fascinated about a few of these reentry challenges. Issues like training, transportation, housing aren’t prison justice points, these are neighborhood points…”

Because the dialog ended, the panelists highlighted different methods to measure success, together with rising neighborhood collaboration and particular person empowerment. And whereas the usual measure of profitable reentry is commonly avoiding a return to the prison justice system, Sanchez highlighted that “…if we wish to begin altering among the inequities, we have to have the people who we’re serving empowered with pathways in order that they might not solely be served however be one of the best at serving others.” This underscored Lacey’s name to maneuver to higher funding in individuals and “…transfer from prison justice to human justice…”

These phrases shared through the panel dialogue nonetheless have a powerful impression on me right this moment. They’ve impressed us at HHS to proceed shifting ahead with a re-invigorated power in our reentry associated work and I hope they encourage you to take related efforts in your work. For a compiled checklist of reentry assets that might assist you to advance reentry efforts in your space, please go to the Workplace of Minority Well being’s Reentry Assets webpage. These excited about studying extra about doubtlessly internet hosting a reentry simulation of their space can attain out to Tasha Aikens at Tasha.Aikens2@usdoj.gov.


1 Sawyer, W. & Wagner, P. (2023, March 14). Mass Incarceration: The Complete Pie 2023. Jail Coverage Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/stories/pie2023.html

2 Alper, M., Durose, M.R. & Markman, J. (2018). 2018 replace on prisoner recidivism: A 9-year follow-up interval (2005-2014). Washington, DC: US Division of Justice, Workplace of Justice Packages, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

3 Binswanger, Ingrid A., Marc F. Stern, Richard A. Deyo, Patrick J. Heagerty, Allen Cheadle, Joann G. Elmore, and Thomas D. Koepsell. “Launch from jail—a excessive threat of demise for former inmates.” New England Journal of Medication 356, no. 2 (2007): 157-165.

4 Patterson, Evelyn J. “The dose–response of time served in jail on mortality: New York State, 1989–2003.” American Journal of Public Well being 103, no. 3 (2013): 523-528.

5 Binswanger, Ingrid A., Patrick J. Blatchford, Shane R. Mueller, and Marc F. Stern. “Mortality after jail launch: opioid overdose and different causes of demise, threat elements, and time tendencies from 1999 to 2009.” Annals of inside medication 159, no. 9 (2013): 592-600.

6 Fiscella, Kevin, Margaret Noonan, Susan H. Leonard, Subrina Farah, Mechelle Sanders, Sarah E. Wakeman, and Jukka Savolainen. “Drug-and alcohol-associated deaths in US Jails.” Journal of Correctional Well being Care 26, no. 2 (2020): 183-193.



Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here